Please read and understand the author's guidelines for preparing the manuscript. Authors who submit a manuscript to the editors should comply with the author's guidelines and template. If the submitted manuscript does not comply with the guidelines or uses a different format, it will be rejected by the editorial team before being reviewed. The editorial team will only accept a manuscript that meets the specified formatting requirements (downloadable at: Journal Template). This template is designed to assist authors in preparing their manuscripts; it is an exact representation of the format expected by the editor. To use this template, please just download it to your document, then copy and paste your document to that template. All papers submitted to the journal should be written in English.

Paper Format

  • The word limit for the submission is 4000-8000 words (including abstract).
  • The sequence of manuscripts should follow: Title; Abstract; Keywords; Introduction; Materials and Methods; Results and Discussion; Conclusion; Acknowledgements; and References.
  • Referencing style uses the American Psychological Association (APA) Style.

Title

  • Titles of articles are written with Times New Roman Bold (16 pt) and preferably not more than 12 words.
  • Author(s) name, affiliations, and email should be included.

Abstract

  • The abstract should be clear, concise, and descriptive. It should provide a brief introduction to the problem, the objective of the paper, followed by a statement regarding the method and a brief summary of results.
  • Font: Times New Roman (10 pt) and preferably not more than 250 words.

Keywords

Keywords should be arranged alphabetically and should have at least two keywords and maximum five keywords.

Introduction

The introduction should be clear and provide the issue to be discussed in the manuscript. It should include a clear background, a statement of the problems, relevant literature on the subject, proposed approaches or solutions, and the new values (innovations) of the research.

Materials and Methods

This section should explain the research chronologically, including research design, research procedures (in the form of algorithms, pseudocode, or others), and data acquisition. The description should be supported with references.

Results and Discussion

This section explains the results of the research and presents a comprehensive discussion of the findings. Results can be presented in figures, graphs, tables, and others, enabling readers to understand the results easily.

Conclusion

Conclusions should answer the objectives of the research. Tells how your work advances the field from the present state of knowledge. Without clear Conclusions, reviewers and readers will find it difficult to judge the work and whether or not it merits publication in the journal. Do not repeat the Abstract or just list experimental results. Provide a clear scientific justification for your work, and indicate possible applications and extensions. You should also suggest future works and/or policy implications.

Acknowledgements (if any)

Recognize those who helped in the research, especially funding supporters of your research, if any. Include individuals who have assisted you in your study: Advisors, Financial supporters, or may other supporters, i.e., Proofreaders, Typists, and Suppliers who may have given materials. 

References

The editorial team will ensure that the research references are credible in terms of number and quality. It is recommended that at least 80 percent of literature sources be taken from primary references (journals and research articles) published in the last ten years of the total bibliography. Primary references must also be closely related to the theme or problem being studied. Self-citations should cover no more than 30 percent of the total bibliography.

The bibliography shall be written following the American Psychological Association (APA) Style. Use tools such as EndNote, Mendeley, or Zotero for reference management and formatting, and choose APA style.

Note for the Authors:

The editorial board is rigorous regarding plagiarism. The journal believes that taking the ideas and work of others without giving them credit is unfair and dishonest. Copying even one sentence from someone else's manuscript, or even one of your own that has previously been published, without proper citation, is considered plagiarism—use your own words instead. The editorial board retains the absolute authority to reject the review process of a submitted manuscript if it is subject to minor or major plagiarism and may cancel the publication upon the complaint of victim(s) of plagiarism.